The ACAI Rubric Assistant helps instructors quickly generate rubric criteria and performance level descriptions using AI, saving time while maintaining pedagogical quality and consistency.
This guide explains what the ACAI Rubric Assistant does, how to use it, and its current limitations.
What is the ACAI Rubric Assistant?
The ACAI Rubric Assistant uses AI to support instructors in creating rubrics by:
Generating criteria based on an assignment description
Suggesting performance level descriptions (e.g. Exemplary, Proficient, Developing)
Helping refine wording for clarity and consistency
It is designed as a starting point, not a final grading authority. Instructors retain full control over editing and approving rubric content.
Where can I find the ACAI Rubric Assistant?
You can access the ACAI Rubric Assistant when creating or editing a rubric in supported FeedbackFruits activities, such as:
Assignment Review
Peer Review
Group Member Evaluation (with rubrics enabled)
When opening the rubric editor, the ACAI option will appear as a suggestion or assistant panel.
How to use the ACAI Rubric Assistant
Step 1: Create or open a rubric
Open your FeedbackFruits activity.
Go to Rubric settings.
-
Click Create new rubric or edit an existing one.
Step 2: Provide context for ACAI
To get meaningful suggestions, make sure your activity includes:
An assignment description or instructions
Clear learning objectives or assessment focus
The quality of ACAI suggestions depends on the clarity of this input.
Step 3: Generate rubric suggestions
Click the ACAI Rubric Assistant option.
-
Review the suggested:
Criteria
Performance levels
Descriptions per level
-
Select the suggestions you want to keep.
Step 4: Review and edit manually
All ACAI-generated content is fully editable. We strongly recommend:
Reviewing alignment with course learning outcomes
Adjusting wording to match your grading standards
Ensuring clarity for students
What the ACAI Rubric Assistant does not do
It’s important to note the following limitations:
ACAI does not assign weights to criteria
ACAI does not determine grades automatically
ACAI does not aggregate scores across criteria
Criterion weighting (e.g. 30%, 25%) is not supported inside the rubric editor
If weighting is required, this must be handled:
At the activity grading level, or
Manually after exporting results
Best practices
Use ACAI as a drafting aid, not a final rubric
Always review AI-generated content before publishing
Communicate expectations clearly to students, especially if using rubrics formatively
If weighting is important, include it in the criterion title or description (e.g. “Clarity & Organization – 25%”)